🔗 Share this article

Over the weekend, Battlefield Studios launched a new playlist called Casual Breakthrough. To put it simply, this option mirrors the regular Breakthrough format but features a few notable adjustments:

• Each team includes only eight real players, with the rest made up of 32 bots.
• Actions done by human gamers grant full XP, while bot actions provide reduced XP.
• Just a pair of maps are available: Siege of Cairo and Empire State.
• Features like Dogtags, achievements, and career stat updates have been turned off.

In short, the playlist delivers on its name: it's a laid-back version of Breakthrough. On the surface, you might think there's nothing wrong, as it gives additional choices for gamers looking for different methods to have fun with the title. However, gaming history has shown one thing, it's that you can't please everyone. Which is to say, many BF6 players are mad.

Community Responses: From Fury to Praise

"Gamers prefer real players. Don't repeat the mistakes of your competitors," reads a response to the mode reveal. "Absolutely shocking concept," comments another. At the same time, on the Battlefield subreddit, a player remarks, "I have no idea where we are going with this game," and someone else details all the issues they believe to be problematic in the game: "Resolve glitches, fix drone glitch, fix IVF rockets, adjust aiming after sprinting, fix awful hit registration. We don't need this bot mode."

On the other hand, amid the criticism, some gamers explaining how much they're enjoying the recent addition. "It's very fun to warm up, real players prevent it from being a total farmfest but it's quite laid-back," reads a forum post. "The community fails to see that there are gamers who have lives and don't play this game 24/7. Allow them to find a middle ground," adds another. One reply on Twitter clarifies that as they're "a battledad with busy schedules, this is great for me," and another applauds the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Constructive Criticisms and Community Input

Despite the support, there are valid points to criticize the new mode. Some users have pointed out that it will make wait times even longer for other modes because of the sheer number of options currently available. Similarly, some areas often face AI-filled matches in the existing playlists. Additionally, it appears a little backwards that the mode won't start without a minimum number of human gamers, despite it focuses mostly on fighting AI opponents.

Finally, a major grievances is that Battlefield Portal was meant to offer full XP, including AI matches, but that got canned when they attempted to remove bot farms from the mode. So this new playlist seems like the community meeting them in the middle, according to forum feedback. Another labels this mode as the devs "making a mistake significantly, I had so much fun in the initial release, why did they feel the need to adjust it?"

Future Prospects: Adjustments Be Made?

Should the development team has demonstrated something to date with Battlefield 6, it is that they're paying attention and acting on player input. Assignments that were overly hard were adjusted rapidly, as did the specific battle pass objectives. It is likely that, should analytics shows this new playlist isn't performing to their standards, they will not hesitate to change it again.